Incorporating reviews of related literature in the Senior Seminar Labs meets several objectives:
Develop library skills.
Exposure to scientific journals.
Incorporate the latest references pertaining to a subject.
Develop communication and writing skills by analyzing articles and succinctly summarizing the key points of the article in a literature review.
See the research literature review guidelines for proper format and examples of work: Annotative Bib Guidlines .
5 - Exemplary
Review written in correct format (typed, doubled-spaced, one inch margins, 12 point font, one paragraph per major concept, one page in length, correct article citation at top of page in APA format).
Article selected for review is from an appropriate professional journal or other appropriate resource that the technology instructor has approved.
Main points of article are summarized in paragraph form with no personal opinions included.
Copy of article attached to review.
CVGS pledge written and signed at bottom of page.
4 - Meets most criteria
Meets exemplary criteria except for incorrect article citation or minor errors in format or summary (grammar, spelling)
3 - Acceptable
Meets only 3 of the first 4 exemplary criteria.
2 - Below expected standards
Meets only 2 of the first 4 exemplary criteria.
1 - Unacceptable
Meets only 1 of the first 4 exemplary criteria.
0 - No credit
Work has not been pledged or,
No review submitted for evaluation.
Note: One point per day will be deducted for late work. If the review is not turned in by the following Thursday it will receive zero credit.